Cognitive clarity and a human rights-based approach
"I consider paedophiles in themselves to be just normal people with unfortunate sexual proclivities. This is not the same thing as condoning paedophiles who treat children in nasty and vicious ways. I am not homophobic but I am still against male on male rape. I am not a man hater but I still condemn male on female rape. I am not a hysterical peodo killer but I still condemn the rape of children. But many paedophiles are gentle, they don't mean to disturb and distort the sexualities of the children they "molest" and are often both under the delusion that what they do is consensual and under the non-delusion that they are in love with the child. Also many of them struggle against their urges. They may look at child porn but they don't fuck children. They may expose themselves to children but they don't rape them. There are huge grey areas around these issues that people just don't want to talk about. Like children consenting or appearing to consent. Like the sexuality of children. Like the cycles of abuse where a paedophile is often repeating the pattern of sexuality that they are familiar with – the whole abused becoming abuser thing."
Cheers dave.
(And on the other, there should be no enigma - I'm not usually quite so lost for words. my flatmate called me enigmatic yesterday, but she had good reason.)